Georgia Nunez v. Gary F. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that advice of counsel is not dispositive on the issue of reasonableness
• holding that advice of counsel is not dispositive on the issue of reasonableness
• holding that an employee’s refusal to limit attendees at training seminars to those court employees who had worked on her supervisor’s re-election campaign was expressive conduct on a matter of public concern
• disagreeing with a supervisor on a “matter of public concern” was not insubordination
• “A public employer cannot claim disruption of a close personal relationship to cover up animus toward an employee’s speech and a desire to silence the employee.”
• “A public employer cannot claim disruption of a close personal relationship to cover up animus toward an employee’s speech and a desire to silence the employee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).