Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights v. Deal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff is entitled to early discovery targeted at identifying an unnamed defendant if the plaintiff (1
• holding that a plaintiff is entitled to early discovery targeted at identifying an unnamed defendant if the plaintiff (1
• recognizing that “[s]ervice of process can pose a special dilemma for plaintiffs in cases . . . [where] the tortious activity occurred entirely online.”
• finding that the first factor was met where there 5 was evidence most of the unknown defendants had a California domicile
• explaining that the first factor “is necessary to ensure that federal 20 requirements of jurisdiction and justiciability can be satisfied”
• explaining that 20 the first factor “is necessary to ensure that federal requirements of jurisdiction and justiciability 21 can be satisfied”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).