· 1/13/1970
Georgia C. Brown v. United States
Citations
- 419 F.2d 337
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the Court will not consider medical treatises for purposes of proving the probative facts of opinions in the articles since they are hearsay
- “medical treatises, recognized by the expert witness as authoritative, may be used in cross-examination, but are not admissible to prove the probative facts of opinions in the treatises since they are subject to the hearsay rule”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mehaffy, Gibson, Heaney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.