George Zelinski, Jr. And Pinbreaker, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding district court properly characterized patent attorney expert’s statement as conclusory because the statement was an assertion without further explanation
• affirming district court’s grant of summary judgment where only evidence on infringement under doctrine of equivalents was conclusory statement of patentee’s expert
• affirming grant of summary judgment when non-moving party presented only a conclusory statement that there was infringement under the doctrine of equivalents
• “expert’s assertion without any further explanation that ‘[b]ecause there is literal infringement, there is infringement under the doctrine of equivalents’ ” too conclusory to constitute sufficient evidence of equivalency to avoid summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).