George Zahodnick v. International Business MacHines Corporation Lockheed Martin Federal Systems, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment for defendants and noting that a relator “[s]imply reporting his concern of a mischarging to the government to his supervisor does not suffice to establish that [the relator] was acting ‘in furtherance of’ a qui tam action”
• on defendant’s counterclaim for breach of confidentiality, district court did not err either in enjoining plaintiff from disclosing defendant’s confidential materials to third parties or in ordering plaintiff to return all confidential materials to defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).