George X v. Charles E. Brittingham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[e]ven if a dismissal is without prejudice, if the court intended the decision to be a final, appealable order, it constitutes dismissal of the entire action, and the more stringent postjudgment standards [of Rules 59(e) and 60(b)] apply.”
• dismissing Illinois negligence claim for lack of duty, explaining, “We agree with the Seventh Circuit’s reading of Cooney and accordingly adopt its conclusion.”
• rejecting the concept of PII as a benefit conferred in exchange for data protection
• discussing recent Sev- enth Circuit interpretation of Illinois law and “adopt[ing] its conclusion”
• “The FTCA creates no private right of action.”
• “The FTCA creates no private right of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).