Skip to main content
· 10/25/1999

George Williams v. Ernest Edwards

Citations

  • 195 F.3d 95
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 26845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “However, ‘the “in custody” requirement for federal habeas jurisdiction’ is satisfied when a pro se petition, liberally construed, ‘can be read as asserting a challenge to a current sentence, as enhanced by an allegedly invalid prior conviction.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, Newman, Keenan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.