· 3/4/2014
George Wesley Huguely, V v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Citations
- 63 Va. App. 92
- 754 S.E.2d 557
- 2014 WL 818612
- 2014 Va. App. LEXIS 62
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the word “think” can have different meanings and that the “contextual determinations must be made by the trial court during voir dire”
- applying the plainly wrong standard to a question of juror impartiality
- in upholding a trial court’s decision to give a proffered jury instruction, noting that it was a model instruction
- “[T]he word ‘think’ can have different meanings depending on one’s demeanor, emphasis, and tone of voice . . . .”
- “[C]ontextual determinations must be made by the trial court during voir dire.” (emphasis omitted)
- trial court has substantial discretion as to order of witnesses and manner of examination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Petty, Beales, Chafin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.