Skip to main content
· 3/4/2014

George Wesley Huguely, V v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Citations

  • 63 Va. App. 92
  • 754 S.E.2d 557
  • 2014 WL 818612
  • 2014 Va. App. LEXIS 62

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the word “think” can have different meanings and that the “contextual determinations must be made by the trial court during voir dire”
  • applying the plainly wrong standard to a question of juror impartiality
  • in upholding a trial court’s decision to give a proffered jury instruction, noting that it was a model instruction
  • “[T]he word ‘think’ can have different meanings depending on one’s demeanor, emphasis, and tone of voice . . . .”
  • “[C]ontextual determinations must be made by the trial court during voir dire.” (emphasis omitted)
  • trial court has substantial discretion as to order of witnesses and manner of examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Petty, Beales, Chafin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.