George Washington Memorial Park Cemetery Ass'n v. Memorial Development Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appellant waived because the fundamental basis for the conclusion is the same. The record cannot support Williams’s claim because Cruz never testified and counsel never proffered what Cruz’s testimony would have been, making an analysis of harm (or prejudice
• noting that Rule 414 supersedes OCGA § 24-4-404 (b), and permits the admission of propensity evidence
• plain error was inapplicable where counsel saw the exhibits and twice stated that he had no objection to either exhibit
• “when the defendant seeks to attack a victim’s credibility, the State has an increased need to introduce evidence of prior acts.”
• “[W]hen the defendant seeks to attack a victim’s credibility, the State has an increased need to introduce evidence of prior acts.”
• appellant affirmatively waived his objection to exhibits by stating that he had “no objection” to them when they were tendered into evidence, and so could not show plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).