George WASHINGTON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \[s]ubstantiality of evidence\ depends upon the \record taken as a whole\
• recognizing that “[sjubstantiality of evidence” depends upon the “record taken as a whole”
• holding that ALJ erred in rejecting treating physicians' opinions when there was no conflicting evidence
• noting that failure to provide the court “with a sufficient basis to determine that appropriate legal principles have been followed is grounds for reversal” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• consulting psychiatrists’ observation of claimant’s relative stability under nonstressful circumstances did not undercut treating physicians’ opinions about inability to cope with stress of handling people and demands in work setting
• discussing 20 C.F.R. pt 404, subpt. P., App 1, § 12.00(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).