George v. Stone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding intentional injury exclusion inapplicable because injuries caused by insane insured cannot be considered to have been caused intentionally
• a tort-feasor's insanity at the time he inflicted injury may preclude application of a liability insurance policy provision excluding an intentionally caused injury
• insane person cannot perform intentional act; summary judgment in favor of insurer was inappropriate because insanity is question of material fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).