George v. Lane
Citations
- 80 Kan. 94
- 102 P. 55
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Damages — Breach of Contract. A party entitled to recover on the breach of a contract should be allowed such damages as are the natural, direct and proximate result of the breach.</p> <p>2. - Same. Where G. and M., in consideration of the conveyance to them of a farm, agreed to transfer a stock of goods to L. and L. and to furnish a buyer fo'r a one-half interest in the goods for a certain sum, and the transfer of the goods and conveyance of the farm were duly made but G. and M. failed to furnish such buyer, the measure of damages for such default is the difference between the market value of such one-half interest and the sum for which it was to have been sold had a buyer been produced as agreed, together with.interest on the amount of such difference.</p> <p>3. Evidence — Measure of Damages — Breach of Contract. The amount received upon the sale of such one-half interest at an auction fairly advertised and conducted, of which the defendants had notice, is evidence of such value, but is not conclusive, and the defendants had the right to offer evidence of such value to show that it was greater than the amount so received.</p> <p>4. Contracts — Consideration. A statement or promise made by L. and L.’after the conveyance and transfer had been completed, without any new consideration, purporting to waive the obligation of. G. and M. to find such purchaser, which was not acted upon to their loss or injury, is ineffectual to relieve them from liability.</p>
Judges: Benson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Challis v. HartloffSupreme Court of Kansas· 1933-01-28· cited 32×
- Tacoma & Eastern Lumber Co. v. Field & Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1918-02-01· cited 19×
- Ely v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1917-11-10· cited 14×
- McGrew v. Ide Estate Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1920-02-07· cited 10×
- Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. FranciscoSupreme Court of Kansas· 1920-05-08· cited 10×
- Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1935-01-10· cited 9×
- Law Co., Inc. v. Mohawk Const. & Supply Co.D. Kansas· 2010-03-16· cited 6×
- Vincent, Albin & Strahl v. HinesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1924-09-26· cited 6×
- Burchfield v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-05-09· cited 4×
- Hinchey v. StarrettSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-06-06· cited 4×
- Harold v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1914-12-12· cited 4×
- Dickinson v. Lawrence Lodge No. 4Supreme Court of Kansas· 1932-04-09· cited 3×
- Lane v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1911-05-06· cited 2×
- Spencer v. AgnewSupreme Court of Kansas· 1922-11-04· cited 2×
- Titus v. WhitesideN.D. California· 1916-01-11· cited 2×
- Holdridge v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1929-10-14
- Woodworth v. KendallSupreme Court of Kansas· 1953-04-11
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.