Skip to main content
· 1/10/1985

George V. Hamilton, Inc. v. Everett Co.

Citations

  • 104 F.R.D. 106
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that defects reflecting party’s disregard for requirements of FRCP 4 generally not considered curable by amendment
  • summons which lacked both the clerk's signature and the court's seal demonstrated complete disregard for Rule 4 requirements and could not be amended
  • Rule 4(b) is “designed to assure a defendant that the summons was issued by the clerk of court and not by plaintiff. . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.