Skip to main content
· 9/8/1993

George v. Gelman

Citations

  • 506 N.W.2d 583
  • 201 Mich. App. 474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “special or charging lien is an equitable right to have the fees and costs due for services secured out of the judgment or recovery in a particular suit”
  • noting that attorneys’ charging liens in Michigan automatically attach to “funds or a money judgment recovered through the attorney’s services”
  • discussing how an attorney has two types of common law liens on a client's property when the client fails to pay for services rendered
  • “The attorneys’ charging lien creates a lien on a judgment, settlement, or other money recovered as a result of the attorney’s services.”
  • “The special or charging lien is an equitable right to have the fees and costs due for services secured out of the judgment or recovery in a particular suit.”
  • “The special or charging lien is an equitable right to have the fees and costs due for services secured out of the judgment or recovery in a particular suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzgerald, Connor, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.