· 3/27/1991
George v. Frank
Citations
- 761 F. Supp. 256
- 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3602
- 1991 WL 45858
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “FECA coverage, which is most commonly associated with work-related accidents and diseases, clearly fails to preclude [plaintiff’s] request to pursue her discrimination claim under the umbrella of equitable remedies available under Title VII”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.