Skip to main content
· 3/27/1991

George v. Frank

Citations

  • 761 F. Supp. 256
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3602
  • 1991 WL 45858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “FECA coverage, which is most commonly associated with work-related accidents and diseases, clearly fails to preclude [plaintiff’s] request to pursue her discrimination claim under the umbrella of equitable remedies available under Title VII”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.