George v. Fox West Coast Theatres

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging the possibility that the duty to maintain “could encompass affirmative measures to upgrade,” but noting that the question would be one for the jury
• declining to grant summary judgment for 8 the defendant because the plaintiff presented evidence that a reasonable person could infer 9 that a small bolt hole in a walkway was unreasonably dangerous
• evidence was such that the jury could infer that condition was unreasonably dangerous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).