George v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Washington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the motor home was insured because it did not leave the insured property during the period of coverage and was not subject to motor vehicle registration
• “Exclusionary clauses are narrowly construed for the purpose of providing maximum coverage for the insured.”
• \Exclusionary clauses are narrowly construed for the purpose of providing maximum coverage for the insured.\
• collateral estoppel does not apply if even one element fails
• “[T]he purpose of insurance is to give protection and it can be 19 || presumed that such was the intent of the parties. Exclusions are contrary to this basic intent, and 20 || thus should not be extended beyond their clear and unequivocal meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).