Skip to main content
· 3/22/2001

George v. Dade

Citations

  • 769 A.2d 760
  • 2001 D.C. App. LEXIS 77
  • 2001 WL 276983

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that statutes are to be construed to avoid “absurd or plainly unjust results”
  • noting that statutes are to be construed to avoid \absurd or plainly unjust results\
  • noting that statutes are to be construed to avoid “absurd or plainly unjust results”
  • purpose of the notice of claim provision is “to ensure adequate opportunity for investigation to determine facts, and to protect District revenues against unreasonable claims”
  • “Where two or more statutes relate to the same subject area, we construe them together. See Harman v. United States, 718 A.2d 114, 117 (D.C. 1998

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wagner, Reid, Glickman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.