George v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]ransmittal letters or ac-knowledgements of receipt that do not include legal advice []or disclose privileged matters are not subject to the attorney-client privilege.”
• blanket assertion of work product immunity with regard to large number of documents inadequate to prevent discovery
• “Merely attaching . . . documents to attorney-client communications does not constitute a basis for assigning privilege. To permit this result would abrogate the well-established rule that only the communication, not the underlying facts, are privileged.”
• finding letters from lobbyist to client not protected work product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).