George v. Bay Area Rapid Transit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding compliance with DOT regulations satisfied transit authority’s obligations to make transit facilities accessible under Title II
• “The party challenging an agency’s action as arbitrary and capricious bears the burden of proof . . . .”
• expansive interpretations of ADA can be “problematic” because “courts are ill-equipped . . . to make what amount to engineering, architectural, and policy determinations as to whether a particular design feature is feasible and desirable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).