GEORGE ST. FLORANT v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appellants waived an argument by omitting it in district court and in the opening appellate brief
• stating that an argument by the appellant was too late because it had not been raised in district court or in the opening appellate brief
• holding an argument had been “forfeited by Defendant because it was not raised in district court”
• approving district court’s discretion in how it counted 32 restitution payments
• “The general rule in this circuit is that a party waives issues and arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).