George Siegler Co. v. Norton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \statute [that is] wholly procedural in its operation\ must yield to procedural rule promulgated by Supreme Court under its constitutional authority
• holding statute addressing procedural aspects of contributory negligence operated within field of Court’s exclusive rule-making power and was superseded by Court’s rules and, therefore, no longer effective
• holding statute addressing procedural aspects of contributory negligence operated within field of Court's exclusive rule-making power and was superseded by Court's rules and, therefore, no longer effective
• noting that “statute [that is] wholly procedural in its operation” must yield to procedural rule promulgated by Supreme Court under its constitutional authority
• statute could not mandate submission of issue of contributory negligence to the jury
• statute could not mandate submission of issue of contributory negligence to the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).