Skip to main content
· 5/29/1991

Federal Case

Citations

  • 934 F.2d 30
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that \a mere possibility of irreparable harm is insufficient to justify the drastic remedy of a preliminary injunction\
  • stating that `a mere possibility of irreparable harm is insufficient to justify the drastic remedy of a preliminary injunction'
  • stating that \a mere possibility of irreparable harm is insufficient to justify the drastic remedy of a preliminary injunction\
  • describing quia timet as the surety's \right\ to demand security from its principal and also as a \procedural device\
  • noting that “a mere possibility of irreparable harm is insufficient”
  • noting that “a mere possibility of irreparable harm is insufficient”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.