George R. Ambati and Pranaykumar Ambati v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, and Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that IJ’s denial of continuance did not violate alien’s right to due process where there was no evidence that more time would have altered outcome
• holding that IJ’s denial of continuance did not violate alien’s right to due process where there was no evidence that more time would have altered outcome
• reasoning that the absence of harm over a five-year period undermined the petitioner’s application for asylum
• reasoning that right to due process is not violated when alien permitted to present claim fully and fairly
• examining alleged incidents of past persecution in determining whether petitioner had an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution
• examining alleged incidents of past persecution in deter- 12 No. 01-3339 mining whether petitioner had an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).