Skip to main content
· 2/20/1985

George Pierce and Jeff Pierce, Individually and D/B/A Pierce Sales, a Partnership v. Ramsey Winch Company, a Foreign Corp.

Citations

  • 753 F.2d 416
  • 1 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 356
  • 20 Fed. R. Serv. 494
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging lack of clarity in Fifth Circuit’s case law on this point and explaining that (continued...
  • “It is clear ... that an antitrust plaintiffs post-violation successes do not necessarily preclude compensation for damages proximately caused by an antitrust violation.”
  • “a defendant is also entitled to have the jury instructed on the law that supports defensive theories that are raised by the evidence”
  • \ 'A party is entitled to reversal for a district court's failure to give a particularly requested instruction ... if the jury was misled by the instructions that were actually given.' \
  • “ ‘A party is entitled to reversal for a district court’s failure to give a particularly requested instruction ... if the jury was misled by the instructions that were actually given.’ ”
  • \[D]efendant bears the burden of demonstrating a failure to mitigate ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Randall, Tate

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.