George P. Stoe v. William E. Flaherty David Carpenter James Carpenter William Smelas Robert Sunderman Ronald Statile

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state-law action to recover unpaid severance benefits from officers of former employer did not “arise in” a bankruptcy case
• holding that plaintiffs claims that arose solely under Pennsylvania state law were insufficient to trigger “arising in” jurisdiction
• noting that “arising under” jurisdiction is limited to proceedings where “the Bankruptcy Code creates the cause of action or provides the substantive right invoked”
• noting that “arising under” jurisdiction is limited to proceedings where “the Bankruptcy Code creates the cause of action or provides the substantive right invoked”
• noting that “arising under” jurisdiction is limited to proceedings where “the Bankruptcy Code creates the cause of action or provides the substantive right invoked”
• stating that \[t]he category of cases 'under' title 11 'refers merely to the bankruptcy petition itself' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).