· 9/11/2012
George McReynolds v. Merrill Lynch
Citations
- 694 F.3d 873
- 2012 WL 3932328
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19033
- 96 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,615
- 115 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1668
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding, in race-discrimination case, that four sentences generally alleging employer’s intentional discrimination did not state a claim
- holding, in race-discrimination case, that four sentences generally alleging employer's intentional discrimination did not state a claim
- finding the district court has significant latitude when dismissing duplicative cases for “reasons of wise judicial administration”
- finding the district court has significant latitude when dismissing duplicative cases for “reasons of wise judicial administration”
- finding the district court has significant latitude when dismissing duplicative cases for “reasons of wise judicial administration”
- “[Allowing a separate suit seeking the same remedy would be redundant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sykes, Tinder, Deguilio
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.