Skip to main content
· 9/11/2012

George McReynolds v. Merrill Lynch

Citations

  • 694 F.3d 873
  • 2012 WL 3932328
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19033
  • 96 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,615
  • 115 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in race-discrimination case, that four sentences generally alleging employer’s intentional discrimination did not state a claim
  • holding, in race-discrimination case, that four sentences generally alleging employer's intentional discrimination did not state a claim
  • finding the district court has significant latitude when dismissing duplicative cases for “reasons of wise judicial administration”
  • finding the district court has significant latitude when dismissing duplicative cases for “reasons of wise judicial administration”
  • finding the district court has significant latitude when dismissing duplicative cases for “reasons of wise judicial administration”
  • “[Allowing a separate suit seeking the same remedy would be redundant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sykes, Tinder, Deguilio

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.