GEORGE, LORENZO, PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding \we object as to the sentence because we believe it is unreasonable\ to be insufficient to preserve a procedural objection
• stating 7 that an agency cannot ignore available material studies, even if it disagrees with them, 8 and must address contrary data
• “By failing to consider the 24 [study’s contrary evidence], [the Service] acted in an arbitrary and capricious 25 manner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).