George Lombard and Lomar, Inc. v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc. (\Bah\), and W. Frank Jones, Individually and as an Employee of Bah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[u]nder New York law, however, decisions as to a lack of reasonable care and its nexus to a plaintiff’s injury are quintessential jury questions”
• “Under New York law, … decisions as to a lack of reasonable care … are quintessential jury questions ….”
• “GDB had no obligation even to consider Lombard's loan application, much less to grant it, and BAH was not hired to communicate anything to Lombard, much less to induce detrimental reliance.”
• “[F]oreseeability and causation . . . are issues generally and more suitably entrusted to fact finder adjudication . . . ” (quoting Palka v. Servicemaster Mgmt. Servs. Corp., 634 N.E.2d 189, 192 (N.Y. 1994))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).