George Hollowell v. David Prater
Syllabus
This case involves a boundary line dispute. The trial court adopted Appellee's surveyor's map and set the common boundary between the parties' property in accordance with the original grantors' intent to deed Appellants 25 acres to have land that would allow their property to have access to the existing public road. Discerning no error, we affirm and remand.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the rule of lenity inapplicable because the Guideline was unambiguous
- “When the language of the guideline is unambiguous, the plain meaning of that language is controlling unless it creates an absurd result.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Kenny Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.