Skip to main content
· 11/19/1990

George Hadges v. Yonkers Racing Corporation

Citations

  • 918 F.2d 1079
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20302
  • 1990 WL 178754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “close nexus” test is “the standard for determining whether state regulatory control qualifies as state action”
  • no state action found even though defendant received a tax credit from the state and the State benefited from revenue from defendant
  • “[T]he State in the instant case does not have a proprietary interest in [defendant’s business].”
  • racetrack’s denial of employment to jockey not state action where racetrack did not act at behest of state official and was not enforcing violation of state racing law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Meskill, Restani

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.