Skip to main content
· 7/26/1995

George Goff v. Charles Harper, Crispus Nix, Ronald Welder, John Henry

Citations

  • 60 F.3d 518
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19605
  • 1995 WL 437395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he burden of proving that a preliminary injunction should be issued rests entirely with the movant”
  • observing that “in the prison context, a request for injunctive relief must always be viewed with great caution” given the complexities inherent in prison administration
  • finding that a request for injunctive relief should be viewed with caution because judicial restraint is necessary when dealing with the “complex and intractable problems of prison administration”
  • observing that “in the prison context, a request for injunctive relief must always be viewed with great caution because judicial restraint is especially called for in dealing with the complex and intractable problems of prison administration”
  • requiring “a right must be violated” for an injunction to issue in the prison context
  • “While no single factor in the balancing of the equities is determinative, the absence of a finding of irreparable injury is sufficient grounds for vacating a preliminary injunction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Lay, Loken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.