Skip to main content
· 2/1/2007

George Franklin Butz v. Kathy Mendoza-Powers, Acting Warden

Citations

  • 474 F.3d 1193
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 2149
  • 2007 WL 270116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a district court may dismiss an action “for failure to pay the filing fee or to comply with the court’s orders”
  • “Because a Rule 60(b) motion by Butz would not be the equivalent of a second or successive habeas petition, his application for authorization to file such a petition is unnecessary.”
  • “Because a Rule 60(b) motion by Butz would not be the equivalent of a second or successive habeas petition, his application for authorization to file such a petition is unneces-. sary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Reinhardt, Hawkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.