George E. Hemenway v. Peabody Coal Company and Peabody Development Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where the scope of one provision is not completely contained within the scope of the other it is impossible to call either \more specific\
• noting that “the period of limitations is tolled between the filing of a class action and the order deciding whether the suit may be maintained as a class action, a principle that covers both grants and denials”
• explaining why lower courts should not follow dicta in Jimenez suggesting that tolling should continue if plaintiffs appeal a denial of class certification
• explaining why lower courts should not follow dicta in Jimenez suggesting that tolling should continue if plaintiffs appeal a denial of class certification
• “Evidence about the beliefs, wishes, hopes, and fears of [a party] would be inadmissible, for only objective evidence may be used to elaborate on a contract’s meaning.”
• “Evidence about the beliefs, wishes, hopes, and fears of [a party] would be inadmissible, for only objective evidence may be used to elaborate on a contract’s meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).