George E. Gooley v. Danielle L. Fradette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s holding that defendant violated EPA by paying plaintiff less for equal or greater work based solely on gender, and that defendant's claim that male employee was \supervisor\ was not supported by evidence
• in finding that male employee had no real supervisory authority, court observed that the office was only two-person office

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).