George Dunbar Prewitt, Jr. v. Merit Systems Protection Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that irregularity such as racial misidentification in the selection process is not “an application of a specific rule, provision, or policy by the agency”
• finding that the appellant failed to allege that OPM was involved in the establishment of allegedly improper minimum qualifications for the position to which he applied
• stating that OPM’s involvement in a selection process must be significant before the nonselection can be characterized as a practice applied by OPM for purposes of 5 C.F.R. § 300.104(a)
• affirming the Board’s dismissal of a non-selection appeal for lack of Board jurisdiction because, as relevant here, the petitioner failed to identify any OPM regulation the agency implemented that resulted in the agency misidentifying the races of the applicants, as alleged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).