George D. Philip v. Ford Motor Company, a Delaware Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking into account whether plaintiff could mow grass, barbeque, and work out on treadmill, among other things
• taking into account whether plaintiff could mow grass, barbeque, and work out on treadmill, among other things
• no evidence of substantial limitation where plaintiff could dress, groom and feed himself, work out on a treadmill, etc.
• “Claims arising under the MHRA are analyzed using the same standard applied to ADA claims.”
• no evidence of substantial limitation where plaintiff could dress, groom and feed himself, work out on a treadmill, etc.
• “The type of evidence most relevant to establishing a substantial limitation in the major life activity of performing manual tasks, includes, for example, an individual’s ability to do household chores, -2- bathe, brush one’s teeth, prepare meals, do laundry, etc”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).