George Corey, Trust Fund v. New York Stock Exchange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a defendant “may not transform what would ordinarily constitute an impermissible collateral attack into a proper independent direct action by . . . altering the relief sought”
• “Extension of arbitral immunity to encompass boards which sponsor arbitration is a natural and necessary product of the policies underlying arbitral immunity.”
• “Failure to comply with this statutory precondition of timely service of notice forfeits the right to judicial review of the award.”
• “[The plaintiff] was not harmed by the selection of the arbitrators and the adjournments of the hearings in and of themselves... Rather, he was harmed by the impact these acts had on the award.”
• “Once an arbitrator has rendered a decision the award is binding on the parties unless they challenge the underlying contract to arbitrate pursuant to section 2 or avail themselves of the review provisions of sections 10 and 11.”
• “The three month notice requirement in section 12 [of the Act] is meaningless if a party to the arbitration proceedings may bring an independent direct action asserting such claims outside of the statutory time period provided for in section 12.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).