Skip to main content
· 7/15/1988

George Cleaver and Edith Cleaver v. James D. Elias and Laura J. Elias

Citations

  • 852 F.2d 266
  • 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 878
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9939
  • 1988 WL 74542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An appeal is possible in the absence of [a Rule 58 final judgment] only if the district court has clearly disposed of all pending matters”
  • “An appeal is possible in the absence of [a Rule 58 final judgment] only if the district court has clearly disposed of all pending matters”
  • “An appeal is possible in the absence of [a Rule 58 final judgment] only if the district court has clearly disposed of all pending matters”
  • “An appeal is possible in the absence of [a Rule 58 final judgment] only if the district court has clearly disposed of all pending matters”
  • sanction imposed under Fed. R. App. P. 38 for premature filing of an appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Flaum, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.