· 7/15/1988
George Cleaver and Edith Cleaver v. James D. Elias and Laura J. Elias
Citations
- 852 F.2d 266
- 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 878
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9939
- 1988 WL 74542
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An appeal is possible in the absence of [a Rule 58 final judgment] only if the district court has clearly disposed of all pending matters”
- “An appeal is possible in the absence of [a Rule 58 final judgment] only if the district court has clearly disposed of all pending matters”
- “An appeal is possible in the absence of [a Rule 58 final judgment] only if the district court has clearly disposed of all pending matters”
- “An appeal is possible in the absence of [a Rule 58 final judgment] only if the district court has clearly disposed of all pending matters”
- sanction imposed under Fed. R. App. P. 38 for premature filing of an appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Flaum, Easterbrook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.