George Brangier v. John B. Rosenthal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing for clear error the “factual premise” that the appellee’s assent to an offer was indeed an acceptance, and not a counteroffer
• reviewing for clear error the “factual premise” that the appellee’s assent to an offer was indeed an acceptance, and not a counteroffer
• “Appellee’s letter responding to appellant’s offer indicated clearly enough an unconditional acceptance of the alternate procedure. Appellee’s assent being clear and unqualified, the requests, inquiries, and mild grumblings which accompanied it did not convert it into a counteroffer.”
• “Appellee’s letter responding to appellant’s offer indicated clearly enough an unconditional acceptance of the alternate procedure. Appellee’s assent being clear and unqualified, the requests, inquiries, and mild grumblings which ac companied it did not convert it into a counteroffer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).