George Brangier v. John B. Rosenthal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing for clear error the “factual premise” that the appellee’s assent to an offer was indeed an acceptance, and not a counteroffer
• reviewing for clear error the “factual premise” that the appellee’s assent to an offer was indeed an acceptance, and not a counteroffer
• “Appellee’s letter responding to appellant’s offer indicated clearly enough an unconditional acceptance of the alternate procedure. Appellee’s assent being clear and unqualified, the requests, inquiries, and mild grumblings which accompanied it did not convert it into a counteroffer.”
• “Appellee’s letter responding to appellant’s offer indicated clearly enough an unconditional acceptance of the alternate procedure. Appellee’s assent being clear and unqualified, the requests, inquiries, and mild grumblings which ac companied it did not convert it into a counteroffer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• David Agema v. City of Allegan
  Sixth Circuit· 2016-06-16· cited 118×
• Kodiak Island Borough v. Large
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-01-23· cited 15×
• Mass. Hous. Fin. Agency v. WHITNEY HOUSE ASSOC
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-09-02· cited 9×
• Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency v. Whitney House Associates
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-09-02· cited 5×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Yankton Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1926-11-22· cited 40×