· 3/2/1960
George B. Wallace Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Citations
- 349 P.2d 789
- 220 Or. 520
- 1960 Ore. LEXIS 400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that temporary use of a rental vehicle is inconsistent with regular use
- seeking to determine the meaning of “fur- nished for regular use” as used in automobile insurance pol- icy; focusing on intent of insurer and insured
- describing “an expressed or implied understanding with the owner of an automobile that the insured could have the use of the par- ticular automobile or perhaps any automobile of the other at such times as he desired”
- distinguishing manner of actual use from insured’s right to use vehicle
- “the clause implies a restriction upon the use of automobiles over which the insured has a rather permanent right of control”
- question turns on “the understanding of the [insured] as to the temporary or more or less permanent use of the automobile when available”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alt, Warner, Perry, Duncan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.