GEORGE B. INABINET, I I I v. HOLLY POWELL INABINET

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[f]utility of amendment can, by itself, justify the denial of a motion for leave to amend”
• recognizing that a reasonable attorney would not provide witness declarations or undertake the expense of requiring witnesses to travel to merely reiterate facts already supported by substantial evidence
• holding that the reasoning of McGautha was controlling in the case before it
• recognizing that state supreme court is the final expositor of state law
• holding that 8 futility alone can justify denial of leave to amend
• recognizing that Bonin filed the amended petition seven months late

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).