Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 4/2/2014
George Alejos v. State
Citations
- 433 S.W.3d 112
- 2014 WL 1349018
- 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 3546
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that EDJA would facially permit \interested party\ to intervene, subject to the security-bond requirement, despite lacking either a particularized interest or taxpayer standing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Pemberton, Rose
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named George Alejos v. State
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- George Alejos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-05-15
- George Alejos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-05-15
- George Alejos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-05-15
- George Alejos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-05-15
- George Alejos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-04-02
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.