George A. Schiltz v. Burlington Northern Railroad Transportation Communications Union

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if doubts arise as to type of dispute at issue, court should construe dispute as minor
• holding that a five-year age difference is insufficient to infer age discrimination
• holding district court must determine whether employer hired someone “sufficiently younger” to make out employee’s fourth element of the prima facie prong
• holding that a five-year age disparity is insufficient to infer discrimination
• indicating that a plaintiff cannot meet the prima facie burden of demonstrating replacement by a younger person if the position is never filled
• holding district court must determine whether employer hired someone \sufficiently younger\ to make out employee's fourth element of the prima facie prong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).