George A. MacKenzie v. Chrysler Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• resorting to state warranty law to 18 determine the applicable measure of damages for violation of “limited warranties” 19 under the Magnuson-Moss Act
• “[T]he legislative history clearly implies that a resort to state law is proper in determining the applicable measure of damages under the Act.”
• for breach of limited written warranty, “resort to state law is proper in determining the applicable measure of damages under the Act”
• “The remedies set forth in [15 U.S.C.A. § 2304] are applicable only to ‘full’ warranties.”
• complaint did not allege personal injury, but did present a claim for consequential economic loss; that claim was dismissed pursuant to interpretation of applicable state law
• for breach of limited written warranty, “resort to state law is proper in determining the applicable measure of damages under the Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).