Georganne Gasaway Durrill v. William Robert Anderson III and Anderson, Lehrman, Barre, Maraist, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the concern of the rule is that knowledge of liability insurance or receipt of insurance benefits may increase or decrease a jury’s damages award
• evidence of insurance may be admitted for a purpose other than to imply that damages should be increased or decreased because a party was insured
• evidence of insurance may properly be admitted if it is relevant to the case
• defendant intended to call agent of its insurer as witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).