Skip to main content
· 7/20/2017

Geoffrey S. Lancaster v. Daniel Verdin, Individually and D/B/A Verde Design + Build

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that statements that plaintiff was convicted of domestic violence were “substantially true” where defendant pleaded guilty to simple battery of his wife and his guilty plea was expunged
  • statement that plaintiff had conviction for misdemeanor domestic violence was substantially true even though his conviction was in fact for simple battery against his wife, and even accepting as true plaintiff’s assertion that his conviction had been expunged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.