Geo. W. Phalin Lumber Co. v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in some circumstances, “ ‘a series of letters can be read together to comprise a clear and unequivocal statement giving the contracting officer notice of the basis for the contractor’s claim.’ ” (citation omitted)
• “According to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, a routine request for payment must meet four requirements in order to be considered a valid claim under the CDA. The request must be: (1) “in dispute” when submitted; (2) a written demand or assertion; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).