Skip to main content
· 5/7/1932

Gentry v. Williams Bros.

Citations

  • 135 Kan. 408
  • 10 P.2d 856
  • 1932 Kan. LEXIS 225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the plaintiff not entitled to work-loss benefits where he failed to document claim that but for the automobile accident, he would have returned to work
  • the plaintiff not entitled to work-loss benefits where he failed to document claim that but for the automobile accident, he would have returned to work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.