· 5/7/1932
Gentry v. Williams Bros.
Citations
- 135 Kan. 408
- 10 P.2d 856
- 1932 Kan. LEXIS 225
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the plaintiff not entitled to work-loss benefits where he failed to document claim that but for the automobile accident, he would have returned to work
- the plaintiff not entitled to work-loss benefits where he failed to document claim that but for the automobile accident, he would have returned to work
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.