Skip to main content
· 9/7/2011

Gentry v. Harborage Cottages-Stuart, LLLP

Citations

  • 654 F.3d 1247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s award of equitable relief to buyers who averred that they would have timely revoked their contracts had they been notified of two-year window for automatic rescission
  • noting a district court commits reversible error when it enters judgment on claims not identified in the motion for summary judgment
  • affirming district court’s award of equitable relief to buyers who averred that they would have timely revoked their contracts had they been notified of two-year window for automatic rescission
  • “In this case, the court entered judgment on claims not identified by Plaintiffs in their Rule 56 motion and without advance notice. This was error.”
  • “Generally, the party claiming an exemption to a statute’s requirements carries the burden of establishing its entitlement thereto.”
  • “In this case, the court entered judgment on claims not identified by Plaintiffs in their Rule 56 motion and without advanced notice. This was error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pryor, Cox, Pannell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.